On 01/31/2013 08:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 21:17 +0100, drago01 wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 14:20 +0100, Robert Mayr wrote:
>>> I think that's not the point, one of the two suites will be dominant
>>> and you can't provide both of them on a live image for example.
>>> LibreOffice was introduced to our live images and we hit target 1GB,
>>> do you really think it could be useful having a larger image just
>>> because you want to provide both of the office suites?
>> The proposal explicitly says that it doesn't envisage including OO on
>> any images or in any default install configurations, simply adding it as
>> an option in the package repositories.
> Which doesn't really need a FESCo approval ... just a package review.
Presumably it was proposed as a feature for the publicity implications.
Yeah well perhaps "features" and "changes" should be separated...