On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 09:24:30AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:53:13 +0100
Václav Pavlín <vpavlin(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
...snip...
> Based on these arguments, I'd like to propose to move this file to
> the fedora-release package (or elsewhere, if you can suggest better
> place). This package is specific to Fedora distribution as well and
> contains Fedora specific configuration files (i.e. Fedora repo
> files). The question of moving the file somewhere else than systemd
> might be really interesting for working groups either. It defines
> which services should be enabled by default after installation, which
> might differ for different products. (Or not, has anybody thought
> about this yet?) An example off top of my head - we would like to
> have sshd enabled after installation by default on server, but
> disabled on workstation.
>
> I would like to ask release engineering for any feedback and
> representatives of working groups to discuss this on their meetings.
From systemd side, this seems like a right move. Coupling the presets
to systemd
package means that they are often unnecessarily delayed.
Wherever they are moved, I think it is important that package has
plenty of maintainers who can do small updates as necessary.
Zbyszek