On Friday 28 August 2009 16:14:51 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
On Friday 28 August 2009 15:36:19 Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 06:47 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > > I have been able to port some 10-12 PolicyKit users from 0.9 to 0.90
> > > in a matter of a few days. The KDE sig should really be able to get
> > > this port done. We really don't want to ship multiple authorization
> > > databases, that way lies confusion and madness.
> >
> > The PolicyKitOne feature page does include in its contingency plan:
> > "If not all ports listed above can be completed in time, keep PolicyKit
> > 0.9 around..."
>
> Right. But from what I've heard that is not the case. Jreznik just said:
>
>
> I have initial port [...] seems like it's working now and usable.
Yes, I have port but I'm not sure how to combine it into current KDE as it
breaks polkit-qt API and I don't like shipping big patches that actually
forks project. I'd like to see it from upstream.
And this apply only to polkit-qt-core, I'm not even sure it's easily possible
to port polkit-qt-gui without mayor rewrite.
Jaroslav
I'm working on this, we have topic for our next KDE SIG meeting.
If you
could join, it would be great -
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Meetings.
Matthias, could you please look at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519674
Thanks
Jaroslav
--
Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik(a)redhat.com>
Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
Office: +420 532 294 275
Mobile: +420 731 455 332
Red Hat, Inc.
http://cz.redhat.com/