Am Sonntag, den 21.12.2008, 12:30 -0600 schrieb Eric Sandeen:
eCryptfs is still somewhat fragile at times; under constrained
usecases
it's reasonably ok but if you stray from that things can go badly...
The stuff Ubuntu has done is interesting but I'm wondering if anyone
there has really given the kernelspace side a good workout. (I've
worked on eCryptfs a lot, and it's pretty nifty, but there are still
some kinks to work out).
Yes, filenames are not encrypted. Maybe this matters, maybe not.
customer-name-finances.odt might be quite a private filename..