On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 16:00 -0400, David Hollis wrote:
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 15:57 -0400, David Cary Hart wrote:
> Is gcc4 being ported to FC3? If I rebuild libtool with gcc4, will that
> resolve the dependency (albeit after the fact).
I'm certainly not authoritative on the subject, but I'm pretty confident
that the answer is no. One of the main reasons for putting out new
releases of Fedora rapidly is to prevent the desire/requirement to
backport everything to older revisions. If gcc4 is something that you
require, you can quite likely recompile the SRPM on FC3 and it may work
ok (I don't know if there are any glibc rev dependencies or the like).
Of course, all of that is at your own risk, buyer beware, all of that
good stuff.
I don't require gcc4. I have been experimenting with things like this to
improve my FQ.
I did build GCC4 (VERY long compile time BTW). On install:
error: Failed dependencies:
binutils >= 2.15.94.0.2-2 is needed by gcc-4.0.0-1.1.P4.i686
gcc = 3.4.3 is needed by (installed)
libtool-1.5.6-4.FC3.2.1.P4.i686
libgcj.so.5 is needed by (installed) ecj-3.0.1-5.i386
libgcj.so.5 is needed by (installed)
gettext-devel-0.14.1-12.i386
libf2c is needed by (installed) compat-gcc-g77-8-3.3.4.2.i386
Most are no problem and I assume that I can rebuild libtool. My concern
is compat-gcc.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list --
Multi-RBL Check:
http://www.TQMcube.com/rblcheck.htm
Kill Spam at the Source:
http://www.TQMcube.com/spam_trap.htm
Today's Spam Trap Adds:
http://www.TQMcube.com/BlockedToday
RBLDNSD HowTo:
http://www.TQMcube.com/rbldnsd.htm