-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:02:09 +0100
Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net> wrote:
Am 13.01.2015 um 20:56 schrieb William B:
> Unbound creates more flakiness than it solves. Unbound caches "no
> answer" as a negative cache entry. If your wireless blips for an
> instant, that's it, result vanishes
simply not true
there is a *huge* difference between a NXDOMAIN response and not
reaching the NS, that said from somebody managing DNS and mail for
some hundret domains over many years
That is the case, but unbound certainly likes to cache no response in it's
negative cache in my experience. It treats them as equivalent.
- --
Sincerely,
William Brown
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=9QZk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----