On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 12:20:55PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
We like the ones that read the archives, present an opinion, debate
it, and
realize at the end of the day some things aren't going to go they way they
want them and some are. We especially like the ones that present patches to
fix things they find broken.
And when they're told it's not broken, they just have to suck it?
I'm not defending ESR here though. Legal issues are pretty much
impossible to fix technically.
Fedora is a community project. If the majority of the community
isn't griping
about something, I doubt a few here and there will make a difference.
The majority of the community does not care either way. Which is true
of pretty much any issue, the caring minority just changing. If you
feel like driving people out just because they're a minority is not a
problem you won't have much of a majority left after a while.
If someone wants to sit there and bitch about things and expect
someone else
to go fix them all the time, they can kindly move the fuck on. Now, if they
want to actually contribute, that is the attitude we want. And that is a great
attitude for the future of Fedora.
I'd be happy to patch anaconda to have "everything" again. I'm
probably going to in practice. I will submit the patch if you want,
but I know it will be rejected, so what's the point?
OG.