On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 10:02 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Kevin Kofler
> I'd rather we just don't add yet another size overhead
to every package. Our
> packages keep growing and growing even without that. A few KiB here, a few
> KiB there, in many packages, adding up to a few MiB, and we keep running
> into size issues with our live image at every single release. Size matters!
Not really, you are restricting yourself by the artificial CD size limit.
You don't have to use the full size of whatever bigger medium you
choose (DVD, 1 or 2GB stick) but you are currently providing a poorer
user experience because you insist on a medium from the last century.
I agree, I think bumping the image size to 1GB and use
DVD/mini-dvd/usb-stick is the sane way forward, since we consistently
run into the cd limit and are forced to make changes that negatively
affect the user experience in various ways.