Il 12/10/22 12:28, Vít Ondruch ha scritto:
So since I don't think the DNF5 name and especially the package
name was
elaborated here and my wish in package review to have the package name
just `dnf` was completely ignored [1], I'll ask here.
Why `dnf5` and not `dnf` version 5. If it is not DNF and it needs
different name, then please rather name it `foobar`. I think that
introducing the version into name is wrong (with exception of compat
packages) and I think that DNF should lead by example and not abusing
the package name for version.
Vít
My guess is that dnf5 is an entirely different beast than dnf. dnf was
written in python, dnf5 is written in C (?), so it's not just a major
version upgrade.
Mattia