On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 04:22:38AM -0400, Radek Holy wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek" <zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl>
> To: devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 10:05:41 PM
> Subject: Re: F23 System Wide Change: Python 3 as Default
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 08:50:14AM -0400, Jan Kurik wrote:
> > = Proposed System Wide Change: Python 3 as Default =
> >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_3_as_Default
> >
> > Change owner(s):
> > * Slavek Kabrda <bkabrda at redhat dot com>
> > * Matej Stuchlik <mstuchli at redhat dot com>
> > * Miro Hroncok <mhroncok at redhat dot com>
> > * Thomas Spura <tomspur at fedoraproject dot org>
> > * Robert Kuska <rkuska at redhat dot com>
> >
> > Up until now, Fedora has used Python 2 as the default Python
> > implementation. This change proposes switching to Python 3. The details of
> > the term "switching" are explained thoroughly in the Scope section.
> >
> > == Detailed Description ==
> > It is currently mature and stable, since it has been under active
> > development for five years
> More than that, I'm sure.
>
> > == Scope ==
> > The main goal is switching to Python 3 as a default, in which state:
> > * DNF is the default package manager instead of Yum, which only works
> > with Python 2
> Does that mean that dnf-3 is going to become the default which is installed
> as /usr/bin/dnf?
> Will "old" dnf be available as /usr/bin/dnf-2?
Why and how long would you need the "old" DNF? dnf-2 and dnf-3 are functionally
the same.
I don't need it at all :), both work fine for me.
I was just asking because I think it is good to be very clear about
such details and the Change page is vague in some places.
Zbyszek