2009/10/7 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com>:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Rahul Sundaram
<sundaram(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 10/06/2009 05:35 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> Additionally, having OLPC-specific RPMS in mainline Fedora helps with
>> the end goal that is , as I understand it, to have OLPC's OS be
>> essentially a Spin of stock Fedora. It also helps OLPC devs who don't
>> necessarily have XOs.
>
> IIRC, they already are shipping stock Fedora in their latest builds
> except for the kernel. They are also responsible for the largest amount
> of Fedora deployments in the world. So it is all mutually beneficial.
That is correct, we're all upstream now with no weird branches for
core packages :-)
Thats great to hear and interesting information. In no way the
question was meant as criticism. Basically i was just curious if the
packages are hardware related to the olpc hw or generally useful.
Thanks for your answer. Best wishes for the olpc/sugar developers.
More knowledge and therefor power to the poor kids.
kind regards,
Rudolf Kastl
Peter
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list