On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 1:33 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 03. 03. 21 12:49, Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
> Compat package prepared.
> Package autoconf269-2.69-1 provides:
> /usr/bin/autoconf269
> /usr/bin/autoheader269
> /usr/bin/autom4te269
> /usr/bin/autoreconf269
> /usr/bin/autoscan269
> /usr/bin/autoupdate269
> /usr/bin/ifnames269
> ...
> Parallel installation successful.
> Any suggestions/concerns are welcome.
My concerns are:
1) Why 269 and not 2.69?
Just a naming convention, if needed can be easily changed
2) Is the parallel installability worth the trouble of different names?
It is up to us to discuss this.
> --
> Miro Hrončok
> --
> Phone: +420777974800
> IRC: mhroncok