On Sat, Sep 03, 2022 at 02:01:59PM +0000, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
Il 26/08/22 07:17, David Tardon ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2022-08-25 at 11:04 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>> On to, 25 elo 2022, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>> We use the python-maint pseudo-account to be the default Bugzilla
>>> assignee for Pythons, e.g.
>>>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.11
>>>
>>> Note that it does *not* require the account to be listed in
>>> maintainers or to have commit rights.
>> Same for ipa-maint account.
> Same for systemd-maint and dracut-maint.
>
> D.
So... wouldn't be better to have a consistent way across all packages to
deal with these cases?
Sure, but Fedora has been around for many years, accross a bunch of
differnt applications and these things have never been completly set.
:(
What's better, a pseudo-user to be the main-admin of a package,
or a
real user to be the main-admin and just add the pseudo-user as the
default assignee of bugs?
We discussed this back when we switched from pkgdb to pagure-dist-git
some. One thought at the time was that we make every package use a
pseutouser for main-admin, but there's downsides to that too.
On the plus side it would allow us to get rid of 'main admin'.
Who owns the credentials of those pseudo-users? Also, Fedora Accounts
user pages links to non-existent wiki pages... it would be nice to have
a description about them (if there's a consensus of continue listing
them as main-admin).
Many of them the group using them has the credentials, or no one at all.
I'm not sure it's possible to get them all sorted, but I agree at least
a wiki page with info on them would be good to have at the very least.
kevin