On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 04:27, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info> wrote:
> The plan is for 2-3 releases a year, and it seems that so far we
are
> doing reasonably well in meeting that plan. Is using a 4-6 month old
> version of ALSA really that bad?
IMHO:
Libs, Utils: Not really.
Driver: Yes.
As long as Hardware-Vendors don't provide Linux-Drivers that are
installable in an *easy* way *we* need to provide device-driver updates
during lifetime of the current Fedora Core version to support newly
released hardware. Sound-Cards are a nice example, there are many other.
Installing a kernel from rawhide is quite easy, and generally there should not
be any problems with it. I think you can safely assume that newer kernels
will be available reasonably often if you don't restrict yourself to main
Fedora releases.
> Also if you know what you are doing
than you can often fix it yourself ;-) Fedora target is not exactly the
end-user, but I think we have enough users that don't know how to fix
such things. Look at fedora mailing lists for examples ;-)
True. However testing a new kernel for release takes a significant amount of
effort. Just doing a quick compile and throwing it to the users isn't going
to make many people happy! Providing the very latest kernel at all times
conflicts with the goal of providing software that is tested and known to be
reasonably reliable.
I think that if you want to have the latest kernel at all times then you just
need to know enough to solve these problems, including compiling your own
kernel on occasion.
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page