On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 10:39 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
So I like the idea, I do propose to simply re-use most of
the blocker bug process for this, rather then inventing yet
another process. I guess this could even be integrated and
the way to get bugs on the list would be to propose them
as blockers as normal and then during the blocker meeting
when the vote says "no this is not a blocker" a second vote
is done to see if it is a critical bug.
Let me phrase my earlier objection a little more strongly and
personally:
If someone tries to make me spend another three damn hours a week
reviewing 'proposed critical bugs' I'm going to jump out a window and
go start that yak farm. You won't see me for dust.
:P
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net