On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 21:44 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> I wouldn't bother much if it would be just one tiny bit of
strange code
> in systemd, but it is FAR from being the only such code. There are lots
> of similar stuff, and it's not accidental.
It is definitely not accidental, but unless you have bugs to file, I
don't think complain generically about systemd architecture here is any
productive.
Where, in your opinion, is the place to discuss systemd architecture?
We discussed systemd for quite a while here and it certainly
far from perfect, for some things probably not even "good" yet. But its
time to file bugs for real problems, not time for bike shedding on
architectural decision that have been taken quite a while ago.
I disagree, and I find the attitude "we are developers, you are idiot"
both quite common and quite wrong.
I am a developer too, do you want me to treat *you* this way too when
you will have trouble with my software?
--
vda