On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Michael Scherer <misc(a)zarb.org> wrote:
Le mercredi 03 juillet 2013 à 09:44 +0200, Johannes Lips a
écrit :
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:32 AM, drago01 <drago01(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Dan Mashal
> <dan.mashal(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Pierre-Yves Luyten
> <py(a)luyten.fr> wrote:
> >> Not sure if it makes any sense but maybe could we
have
> something like
> >> "freeze tag changes until desc is better".
> >>
> >> I propose this because testers will not _really_
want to -1
> karma, and
> >> as a maintainer it might be a bit hard, but with
a good
> reminder like
> >> "not pushed to stable until desc is better" I
would have
> made less
> >> mistakes
> >>
> >> yes not being reminded is not an excuse and such
proposal
> would not save
> >> time, still I believe it could help more than
hurt
> >
> >
> > There is already a perfect example of this.
> >
> >
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-11846/selinux-policy-...
>
>
> This is also a perfect example of useless "does not
fix bug x"
> karma.
> If it is not *worse* then the previous package there
is no
> reason to
> give it negative karma.
> If it doesn't fix the bugs, the update should fix, it is
appropriate
> to give negative karma. Otherwise the bugs would be closed,
when it
> becomes stable, but won't be fixed.
That's not what the guidelines say :
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Update_feedback_guidelines#Update_does_...
Could be, but if the still broken bugs are going to be closed, when
the update becomes stable, doesn't really help, or? Given that this is
enabled in the update.
Then we could decide on :
- better process, ie "if you happen to notice a bug is not fixed by
update, please reopen it"
- better tooling, ie a way to say "do not close this bug" to bodhi.
Either a message in bodhi, or something on bugzilla side.
--
Michael Scherer
--
Michael Scherer