On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 03:54 +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 09:18:54PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> None of this precludes the use of nautilus-open-terminal. You haven't
> responded to the more relevant and important part of my post, which is
> about getting nautilus-open-terminal included as part of a new package
> combination, say for power users.
I did, but probably in other responses to other folks. I think the idea
of a package to add such an IMHO essential triviality back to GNOME
is like asking for people to shop again for the gear shift handle after
buying a new car. It's just completely over the top, IMHO.
Not that I could see from the rest of this thread. New and possibly
better ways of organizing and exposing Extras packages are being
discussed on fedora-extras-list.
--
Paul W. Frields, RHCE
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
Fedora Documentation Project:
http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/