3:33pm David Lutterkort said:
Anybody interested in Fedora Server should have a look at the package
list and let me know if they think a package should be classified
differently; for the Maybe group, I'd appreciate comments on whether the
packages should be included or not (e.g., should FSS support dynamic DNS
and include the various clients for
dyndns.org etc. ?)
This may be debatable, but avahi should *not* be part of the minimal
install. Maybe as an option...with the 802.1X supplicant just mentioned.
And mildly related, I have a couple server-class environments that desire
ImageMagick. The fc6 rpm would have produced a 50 package dependency list!
Some made sense. But others, like avahi, made none.
../C