On 3/4/19 12:47 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 09:40:32AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Also, how are the mass rebuilds envisioned?
Just as anyone would: by opting-out of gating.
Maybe that term is overloaded. The way I see it there are two ways to opt-out:
- remove the gating.yml file in the package's git repo, not scalable especially
for mass-rebuild
- build in the koji candidate tag directly, thus by-passing the testing tag
where tests happen. This would be the approach releng would do for
mass-rebuild.
Well, to be clear, mass rebuilds already use a side tag and then are
merged in. So they would just be merged into the candidate tag or whatever.
> I can't imagine that Ruby
> rebuild will be held from entering rawhide due to some broken
> dependency. Not sure how you want distinguish the package, which is
> typically "single" from "multi" package.
This is a decision left in the hands of the packagers, I'm pretty sure they know
more their packages than I do and thus I'm in no position to make this decision.
I think perhaps it would be useful to easily show waivers?
like a weekly waiver report or something so we could tell what packages
and maintainers are waiving results?
kevin