Dnia 02-02-2006, czw o godzinie 17:29 -0500, Bill Nottingham napisał(a):
[..]
> > Dependency of scim-m17n, replacement for scim-tables.
>
> Replacement ?
> I don't see Obsoletes rules beetween scim-m17n and scim-tables and/or
> why scim-tables is still around ?
Sorry, replacement for some set of languages that scim-tables supported;
I don't recall which ones.
So why m17n-db not supports *only* that scim-tables not supported
languages ?
Using m17n-lib without m17n-db do not have sense so packaging this in
separated binary package also (IMO) do not have sense.
kloczek