On 05/31/2012 12:18 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Gerry Reno <greno(a)verizon.net>
wrote:
> On 05/31/2012 12:13 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Gerry Reno <greno(a)verizon.net> wrote:
>>>
http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot-vs-restricted-boot/statement
>>>
>>> SecureBoot is not about security. It is about restriction.
>> That is just untrue. SecureBoot can be used to make sure you only run
>> the software you intended to run, which is impossible without
>> SecureBoot (e.g. this cannot be done with a TPM). The idea is solid,
>> the technology is or can be made solid.
> No. The user is not in control here. Microsoft is in control.
Remove Microsoft's keys, problem solved.
Mirek
Ah, yes, but then you also won't be able to run Fedora, under the
currently proposed solution. Oops! See how slick the slope is?
--
Libre Video
http://librevideo.org