Le mardi 23 janvier 2007 à 03:13 +0530, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
> Tanguy Eric wrote:
>> I sent this message to fedora-list(a)redhat.com but i had no reaction so i
>> try also the devel one because i find this is problem we have to solve
>> for the core and extras merge, no ?
>>
>> I'm tired to have problems with rt2500 driver at each new fedora kernel
>> release because the versionning seems to not follow standards :
>>
http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=2965
>>
>> What do you think about this ?
>>
>> Someone have similar problems with other modules ?
> This one is going all the way up to Linus since apparently he prefers
> the current naming. See
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SteeringCommittee/Meeting-20070111
> for the glorious details.
>
> Rahul
>
Ok but my problem is not really the kernel name but how a driver can
detect correctly the kernel version and eventually the backported patch
to compile fine ...
Yes. The name of the kernel is directly related to that issue.
Rahul