Dnia 02-02-2006, czw o godzinie 16:50 -0500, Bill Nottingham
napisał(a):
Tomasz Kłoczko (kloczek(a)zie.pg.gda.pl) said:
> Dnia 02-02-2006, czw o godzinie 11:46 -0500, Bill Nottingham napisał(a):
> [..]
> > I expect it's not covered in comps right either - Jens, what's the
> > logic behind this?
>
> (I'm just after short review of m17n)
> IMO it will be better ask why m17n was included to distribution packages
> list.
Dependency of scim-m17n, replacement for scim-tables.
Replacement ?
I don't see Obsoletes rules beetween scim-m17n and scim-tables and/or
why scim-tables is still around ?
kloczek