On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 9:26 AM Vít Ondruch <vondruch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Dne 01. 04. 20 v 14:33 Alex Scheel napsal(a):
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Panu Matilainen" <pmatilai(a)redhat.com>
>> To: devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 6:22:39 AM
>> Subject: Re: CPE Git Forge Decision
>>
>>> I also appreciate that as a community developing our own solutions is
>>> something important and something that seems to matter a lot, but we
>>> have to realize that the development and maintenance effort cannot be
>>> carried out by the CPE team any more. Maybe this is a opportunity to
>>> create a SIG or a working group for people that are interested to carry
>>> on this effort.
>> But this is precisely at the heart of the problem: people feel they were
>> not given an opportunity to lend a hand, and that now its too late
>> because the messaging is that we go with GitLab, no matter what.
> Pagure has huge developer experience bugs filed against it for many
> years. Where have all these contributors been? Are those of us who really
> dislike Pagure's workflows in the minority?
Since you are asking, for dist-git and for ticket tracking in Fedora,
Pagure is much better than what we ever had and with one exception (I am
missing easy access to history of a file), there is not missing anything
substantial.
We're getting this on the next Pagure upgrade:
https://stg.pagure.io/rpm-packages/pagure/history/pagure.spec
--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!