Once upon a time, Adam Williamson <adamwill(a)fedoraproject.org> said:
The biggest one for me is that offline updating - `dnf
offline-upgrade`
- still isn't implemented on dnf5. But I've run into quite a lot of
smaller 'paper cuts', like `dnf history info <packagename>` doesn't
work...just today I found that installing an older kernel doesn't work
(older dnf does this just fine)...there are quite a lot of these at
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues .
I recently ran into a bug with dnf where reposync and repomanage don't
agree on what "new" means, filed a bug against RHEL 9 (where I ran into
it), and the response was that it wouldn't be fixed but it would be kept
in mind when developing that functionality for dnf5. So from that, and
a quick look at the dnf5 packages in F38, I guess neither has been
implemented yet.
I use that in several places to keep local copies of repos, so that
missing is a problem for me.
--
Chris Adams <linux(a)cmadams.net>