Bill Nottingham wrote:
It's a bad spec, and the way that it's done I don't
really see how it's
fixable.
Bill
Work with the Linux Foundation on a new/revised sane LSB spec?
http://www.linux-foundation.org/snapshots/booksets/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-C...
We could also define custom keywords, add custom boot_facility names in the meantime,
etc…