On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(a)wolff.to> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 09:47:26 +0200,
Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at> wrote:
>
> Those packages are also sometimes not compliant with Fedora policies such as
> usage of system libraries because any patches to use a system library need
> trademark approval. This is also just unacceptable. See e.g. the Hunspell
> fiasco:
Isn't this a FESCO issue? Maybe it is time to reopen this issue?
I don't see how using Mozilla trademarks provides significant benefit
to Fedora.
By shipping software using names known to users coming from other OSes?
Btw. the fedora trademark guidelines aren't less restrictive either.