-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/14/2009 09:04 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello All!
Imagine an application, which relies on a specific kernel module. This
module is not a part of stock Fedora kernel (at least, yet), and we
don't allow stand-alone kernel modules.
Whether or not this package can be allowed?
This is an interesting question. Suppose someone wrote (for example) an
GPLed configuration tool for a closed-source hardware driver. Would it
be permissible to include an open-source tool in the distribution, even
knowing it would only ever be usable with a tainted kernel?
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkrVzcsACgkQeiVVYja6o6NwgwCdG10cCIr2pn+HhRWBXx+u4aB7
o8gAn0X1WOxe0Tu8Jo90V0O+cJhnTMPk
=VFnY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----