On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 00:45 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 16:02 -0500, jam(a)zoidtechnologies.com wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 03:44:58PM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Friday 01 December 2006 15:40, Frank S. wrote:
> > > like an extra cd with all the warnings.
> >
> > Because often times that is illegal.
> >
>
> a valid point-- however users want these things and if it's "too
difficult"
> to get them installed and operational they will go elsewhere. like the
> original poster, I applaud the idea of sticking to the guns and not shipping
> any "grey" content, but that does *not* solve the problem for the vast
> majority of potential fedora users, and the matter needs to be addressed
> rather soon if we want to have a serious set of desktop users.
>
> regards,
> J
>
Addressed how?
IANAL, but AFAIK any attempt to make gray content distribution easier
(E.g. Press here to download illegal X) makes you an accomplice in the
distribution of illegal content X.
"lobby-buddy" - a helper app similar to "bug-buddy", but tries
to detect
what country and electoral region you're in, what the legal issue is,
and lets you easily generate a letter to the appropriate elected
representative?