Frank Murphy wrote:
On 30/07/09 15:30, wdepli(a)mikrotec.com wrote:
> I am new to this list, and I am looking forward to hearing the
> discussion.
--snip--
> Is Fedora really gaining that much ground with every bi-yearly
> release to
> justify that pace?
There is talk, just talk at the moment, for and ELC:
Wiki:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Extended_Life_Cycle
Discussion:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-July/msg00253.html
>
> After all Red Hat is not a desktop but a server,
As stated, Fedora is not Red Hat.
Thanks for the links.
It is apparent from reading all these great howdy-dos to my post, that
there is a great difference of opinion on exactly what Fedora is.
As I said, it will be interesting to see what goes on here. I got 86
emails today. What I am hearing is some serious dogmatism and a tone
that is angrily defensive over assumptions that simply are not true.
I think this list is very likely a zoo, but I will keep an open mind.
right? And Chrome could
> kill current races to find a desktop to compete with Windows. So why
> not
> concentrate on what Red Hat/Fedora does best? Let Ubuntu grind out
> Gnome
> and KDE enhancements. How often does Solaris release desktop distros?
Fedora has it's followers, and this one is happy to stick with it.