On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 21:21, Wil Cooley wrote:
On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 06:20, Michael K. Johnson wrote:
> It will take longer to public to
fedora.redhat.com -- we'll need
> a proper CMS to do that for reasons involving infrastructure
> (pushing web site content is currently too heavyweight a process
> for that to work). It's still a good idea, though. :-)
So are you saying that
http://www.redhat.com/software/rha/cms/ isn't a
"proper CMS"? :)
reasons why it doesn't seem like a real cms to me:
1. source code is included - but under what license?
2. it's in java
3. it's in java
4. The Red Hat CMS approach can have a company running a content
management system in as little as two months. - umm - 2months?
-sv