Once upon a time, Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> said:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 05:19:59PM -0700, J. Randall Owens wrote:
> Just on the naming, I'd rather steer clear of the actual concept, let me
> get this straight: You want a group called "adm", presumably short for
> "administrator", the point of which is that it can view system things,
> but not actually *administer* them? Why on Earth call it "adm"?
The group is already there, so it's not a big stretch, but I agree the
naming is confusing when used in this way.
All the more reason for it to be configurable (as wheel is), rather than
hard-coded.
--
Chris Adams <cmadams(a)hiwaay.net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.