On 07/11/2013 06:21 PM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
Have you ever reached to these sub-communities and asked them if
they
are interested in something like this?
In relation to the desktop environments the community surrounding them
have been following the criteria and doing their testing by themselves
with the exception of Gnome of course which we in the QA community have
had to carry from the get go on top of everything else
Because I'm not sure whether
they're and forcing something like this upon them is not the best idea.
We never forced that upon anyone members from those communities ( with
the exception of Gnome ) stepped up walked in and wanted to do it.
First I think keeping the QA know-how in one team actually has a lot
of
benefits.
In one community yes in one team no.
Second I don't think that the sub-communities or spins, if you
will,
have enough manpower and expertize to run their own QA teams.
But you somehow think we in QA or releng for that matter do?
The current team of Fedora testers is rather small and dividing them
into several more teams would lead to a subcritical number of testers to
run a functional QA.
Nobody was talking about diving into the existing reporters base in the
QA community.
Third I don't agree with the opinion that people who create the
software
are the best people to test it.
People that *use* and create the software.
Quite the opposite. Having a QA team
independent on spins is actually a very good idea.
No it's not.
I have witnessed a
lot of situations where developers were too lazy/busy/... to fix serious
problems and it was pertinacity of our independent QA team that forced
them to fix the problems although it sometimes took an escalation to
FESCo.
Really when?
I highly doubt that spin's QA teams would develop into such
independent entities.
Those spins that do not have enough manpower die off which is to be
expected and part of healthy self cleansing process in the project
instead of things as they are now where releng needs to basically try to
carry them alive and working.
JBG