On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:32 AM, drago01 <drago01(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Dan Mashal
<dan.mashal(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Pierre-Yves Luyten
<py(a)luyten.fr> wrote:
>> Not sure if it makes any sense but maybe could we have
something like
>> "freeze tag changes until desc is better".
>>
>> I propose this because testers will not _really_ want to -1
karma, and
>> as a maintainer it might be a bit hard, but with a good
reminder like
>> "not pushed to stable until desc is better" I would have
made less
>> mistakes
>>
>> yes not being reminded is not an excuse and such proposal
would not save
>> time, still I believe it could help more than hurt
>
>
> There is already a perfect example of this.
>
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-11846/selinux-policy-...
This is also a perfect example of useless "does not fix bug x"
karma.
If it is not *worse* then the previous package there is no
reason to
give it negative karma.
If it doesn't fix the bugs, the update should fix, it is appropriate
to give negative karma. Otherwise the bugs would be closed, when it
becomes stable, but won't be fixed.