On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 01:53:12AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Eh. We're constrained by our own policies here, not by anything
> fundamental - LLVM being broken on ARM ought to mean that our ARM
> product is worse, not that everything else is dragged down to the same
> level.
Didn't YOU vote for ARM as a primary architecture, and even actively lobby
for it? Now you get to pick the (poisoned) fruit…
Er. No? I think you're confusing me with someone else.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59(a)srcf.ucam.org