On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 4:24 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:24 AM Vít Ondruch <vondruch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > I think that the basic problem is that the "broken dependencies"
emails
> > are not sent anymore even for Rawhide. This is big loss.
>
> If you think that the weekly "broken dependencies" reports were
> useful, I could set that up again.
> After all, I already have the data, and write out reports in markdown format.
>
> It would be pretty easy to also generate a plain text version and then
> just send that to the devel list on a weekly basis.
> However, for updates-testing reports to be useful, weekly would
> probably be not frequently enough (most updates only sit in -testing
> for 7 days, after all).
>
> The code, data, and reports in easily viewable markdown format are here:
>
https://pagure.io/fedora-health-check
Perhaps you might be willing to look at integrating this with the
updates push composes and/or rawhide? We never got the old spam-o-matic
working with more than just x86_64...
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6365
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7931
(and possibly others/prs)
Fabio's script also only validates on x86_64. I still don't get why
dnf repoclosure is so broken when querying alternative
architectures...
When I wrote the DNF port to spam-o-matic, I made sure it worked, and
it did when I wrote it. Unfortunately something in DNF broke, and I'm
not sure exactly what or how. But there's been significant changes in
architecture handling in the past 8 months, so maybe it'll work
properly now?
--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!