And maybe one more related note to this. We've been asked multiple
times to do auto-merges as well, but that's not really what we want to
do. We do want human approval during the process. (Automation can
suggest the change and once approved take care of the builds/updates,
but a single tool should not go through the whole pipeline without any
human approval.)
František
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 3:13 PM Frantisek Lachman <flachman(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi Petr,
we would like to avoid storing the archive in the lookaside cache before approving but
the problem is that the CI on the PR (mainly the scratch build) does not work without the
archive being in the lookaside cache already. Once this becomes possible, we (=Packit)
would be happy to do this only when approved.
But thanks to the archive hash, we don't build anything to Fedora that is not
approved.
If anyone has any better solution we're happy to improve. We also try to avoid Packit
having too many permissions.
František
(as a Packit PO)
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 1:25 PM Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> V Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 12:53:21PM +0200, Laura Barcziova napsal(a):
> > Yes, Fedora dist-git lookaside cache. The upstream archive is uploaded
> > automatically
>
> Did you know that a license review must precede uploading to Fedora dist-git
> lookaside cache? The reason is once the archive is uploaded, Fedora
> distributes it.
>
> -- Petr
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue