On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 20:41 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
Well, perhaps we should make libproxy *query* pacrunner, but not use
pacrunner's libproxy replacement. That's "just another information
source" for libproxy, but the patch has been languishing for years
without being applied.
http://code.google.com/p/libproxy/issues/detail?id=152
I think that's probably the way forward for now. I've updated the bug
above with a new patch, tested in the F19 libproxy package. I've also
dropped the libproxy-replacement part of the pacrunner package that I've
submitted at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971888
If someone could review that package, I'd be most grateful. I've
actually passed it through fedora-review and posted the results myself,
but of course I'm not allowed to tick the box for my own package :)
--
dwmw2