On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 07:53:09PM -0400, Dimi Paun wrote:
From: "Dave Jones" <davej(a)redhat.com>
> My
http://people.redhat.com/davej/kernels/Fedora/*/ pages have a list
> of patches in each kernel, though they are somewhat out of date now.
Looking at:
http://people.redhat.com/davej/kernels/Fedora/FC4/kernel-2.6.13-1.1529_FC...
I see this:
+ echo 'Patch #1021 (linux-2.6-debug-sleep-in-irq-warning.patch):'
+ echo 'Patch #1900 (linux-2.6-obsolete-idescsi-warning.patch):'
+ echo 'Patch #1901 (linux-2.6-obsolete-oss-warning.patch):'
+ echo 'Patch #801 (linux-2.6-build-userspace-headers-warning.patch):'
/usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:6:2: warning: #warning using private kernel
header; include <endian.h> instead!
/usr/lib/bison.simple:164:5: warning: "YYMAXDEPTH" is not defined
Patch #1021 (linux-2.6-debug-sleep-in-irq-warning.patch):
Patch #1900 (linux-2.6-obsolete-idescsi-warning.patch):
Patch #1901 (linux-2.6-obsolete-oss-warning.patch):
Patch #801 (linux-2.6-build-userspace-headers-warning.patch):
Does this mean that 2.6.13-1.1529 in FC4 has only 4 patches on top of
the upstream kernel?
No, that's a side effect of the output of the build log being fed
through sort -u before grepping for warnings.
Dave