On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 04:05:34PM -0400, Ivan Chavero wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 12:33:30PM -0400, Ivan Chavero wrote:
> >
> > I found this article stating some alarming claims about systemd
> > security, are this claims true?
> >
>
> First of all, do not hijack threads. If you want to start something new,
> start it, and do not reply to unrelated thread.
I'm not hijacking any thread, I STARTED this thread (BTW, just searched for emails
with the "Systemd Security" subject in this mailing list and didn't find
any
immediate matches) because i have an honest concern for Systemd Security and
general functionality.
Couldn't you just post this link instead of mistakenly ranting
about imaginary thread
hijacking?
Your email header contained:
In-Reply-To: <CA+Sa5Fpf5zLb1vYYaauRgRMS19pO1S4PT6oF+XEu53eWw_q6qw(a)mail.gmail.com>
References: <20161005230810.D6E91608780A(a)bastion01.phx2.fedoraproject.org>
<1886682.CMX2iRJoBU(a)ra.ausil.us> <1475767811.24685.6.camel(a)fedoraproject.org>
<CA+Sa5Fpf5zLb1vYYaauRgRMS19pO1S4PT6oF+XEu53eWw_q6qw(a)mail.gmail.com>
Which clearly places it as a reply in thread about Fedora 25 compose status.
QED
--
Tomasz Torcz There exists no separation between gods and men:
xmpp: zdzichubg(a)chrome.pl one blends softly casual into the other.