On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 2:48 AM, Chuck Anderson <cra(a)wpi.edu> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 07:21:26PM -0600, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 197 197 140 Pre-fail Always - 19
> 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 192 190 000 Old_age Always - 86
> off until now. 6 and 7 are from when I first noticed
> Current_Pending_Sector was nonzero, maybe a month or two ago. 8 is from
> my post in July. 9 and 10 are from when the drive was new.
> 1) The SMART health status is PASSED. Just like every other failed drive
> I've had...
Don't look at that alone.
> 2) None of the attributes are failed.
I consider > 0 on Current_Pending_Sector or Reallocated_Sector_Ct to
> 3) By the time the self tests start failing, it is too late, you are
> already losing data.
If Current_Pending_Sector or Reallocated_Sector_Ct increases > 0,
replace the drive immediately.
> We can not trust the drive to assess itself properly. If we ever get a
> SMART desktop alert thing going, we MUST look directly at the
> attributes, and come to our own conclusion.
Yes, we should consider any drive to be failed if it gets any pending
or reallocated sectors.
> Any questions before I RMA the drive?
Why did you wait until you had many pending/reallocated sectors before
RMAing it instead of RMAing it as soon as you had 1 bad sector?
I have a friend in the same situation. His drive is failing the same way as
and the boot is taking too long. However, he always used Ubuntu.
When I warned him, 6 month ago, about the problem, it was too late. He
a high score for the load cycle.
What I do not understand is why the major distributions do not change the
default power save
scheme for laptop disks. It is a so simple solution, and I do not see any
Because of the battery life? Most people use their laptops on AC power
almost all the time.
Even having all partitions backed up with partimage, it is a pain on the
a laptop disk.
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ