-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 06/30/2014 04:10 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 03:44:26PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Any chance that systemd wants to build a hostnamectl-like
> interface for setting the os-release values? That would make life
> a lot easier on us, as we could reconfigure that file if-and-when
> a fedora-release-$PRODUCT package was installed in a %post
> snippet.
What would be the advantage over including /usr/lib/os-release in
the package directly? What kinds of fields could be modified in
this way?
Well, ideally we'd like the majority of the file to be owned by
fedora-release and then just add the one or two additional fields
specific to the products programmatically.
I suppose though that we could just carry complete duplicates in each
fedora-release-* package. Particularly if we end up adding a
fedora-release-nonproduct (or however we name it) package to solve the
depsolving issues as suggested by James Antill.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlOxxacACgkQeiVVYja6o6MoOACbB9WcFYb2rOZfrZvXjcW+lGGC
G4YAoJ5aeFwqV7O4MIDR8D2nEuQaZKY/
=BFiB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----