On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59(a)srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
I think you're looking at this in slightly the wrong way. Being
a
primary architecture isn't meant to be a benefit to the port - it's
meant to be a benefit to Fedora. Adding arm to the PA list means you'll
have to take on a huge number of additional responsibilities, deal with
more people who are unhappy about the impact upon their packages and so
on. You get very little out of it except that there's more people to
tell you that something's broken.
I don't think this is true: On a primary architecture, every package
maintainer is be expected to handle their own packages; this should
actually significantly decrease the load on the "architecture
maintainers".
Mirek