On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 08:12 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 04:55, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Jeremy Katz and others wrote about the loss of
> kernel-source(code)
>
> I think the main problem is that a LOT of people use the current method
well I agree that there are quite a few people who like to build their
own kernel config but based on our source tree. However the plan is to
include quite a bit of information for those people on how to get the
same result. It saves shipping 40Mb of redundant rpm and it saves quite
a bit of installation time though.
> and expect it to be there for whatever arcane method. Just removing it
> without openly discussing it first smacks less of a community project
we're having the discussion now right?
after the fact.
Not exactly likely to go back to the way it was, is it?
-sv