-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sunday 27 August 2006 09:58, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> and this is a problem... why?
> In principle the naming of disk devices shouldn't matter, with
> mount-by-label and the hal fstab changes....
>
> this kind of asynchronous naming is going to get more and more
> prevalent, both due to linux changes in parallel hw discovery and the
> increasing asynchronous nature of hardware in general... so we better
> have the OS ready to deal with that (and afaik FC5 and later are)
IIRC this breaks dmraid.
I use device-mapper-multipath.
- --
Jean-Luc Fontaine
http://jfontain.free.fr/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFE8b3KkG/MMvcT1qQRAoQuAKC1z3NammiQodKxYs5E3JoLroFabACfUwsL
/LB1MgDf38kGElAyafkpfjg=
=ud14
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----