On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 20:21 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Are there any plans to have Red Hat Legal look at the
patent-freeness of
> WebM before we leap to include it? We don't take other people's word for
> it in most cases of potential patent problems, so I don't think it
> follows that we would just take Google's word for it in this case...
According to a comment on the actual bug [1] RH Legal has already reviewed it.
Thanks, I missed that one.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net