On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com> wrote:
You don't mention the eisting 'Virtualization' group
there, which
is historically what people have installed when wanting a virtualization
host. Admittedly this does include some desktop tools too.
Right, I forgot to mention why existing "Virtualization" is not good
enough for this use-cases and it's exactly because it includes GUI
stuff which is not needed on the minimal hypervisor install.
If introducing a new group for the host, then I'd say we might
want
to also change the existing group to be solely the client mgmt tools
"Virtualization Client" ? It gets even more fuzzy when you wonder
where the new 'GNOME Boxes' app will live - probably under 'GNOME'
desktop I presume ?
Renaming current "Virtualization" to "Virtualization Client" makes
sense.
I would put new Boxes into both Virt.Client and GNOME groups, list of
packages are not exclusive.
Alan