On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 13:06 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:23:19 -0400
wwoods(a)redhat.com (Will Woods) wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 13:07 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 19:00 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
...snipp...
> > > Most likely a lot of 1) bugs are already solved but never got
> > > closed / retested, others should be taken upstream (and thus
> > > closed in Fedora BZ), etc.
> >
> > If a lot of 1) bugs are already solved, anyone within the
> > 'fedorabugs' group can act as a proxy to close them out. Team
> > effort would be a very good thing I think.
>
> Well then - let's start friday Bug Days again. This friday (and
> possibly next friday) we can try to work through the FC5 and FC6 test
> release bugs. It's only 380 bugs! Here's the link:
>
>
http://rdr.to/W8
>
> That's (currently) 460 ASSIGNED, MODIFIED, NEEDINFO and NEW bugs
> against all the FC5 and FC6 test releases.
Sounds like a good idea to me. I would be happy to help.
What time? Coordinate on #fedora-devel irc?
Is there more info for people who would like to help?
Usually we do this in #fedora-qa. The following wiki pages should also
be helpful:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TriagingGuidelines
> This might be a good time to mention the recently-created
> fedora-qa-list:
>
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-qa-list
Another list? :( Is that really needed? or couldn't discussions take
place here?
Plenty of discussions *could* take place here - in fact, 10,000 unread
emails indicate that plenty of them *do* take place here - but there was
nowhere to discuss QA-specific things like bug triaging and bugzilla
improvements and regression testing. So yes, it is really needed.
-w