On 1/1/06, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm(a)atrpms.net> wrote:
On the contrary I would even assert, that for ATrpms the contrary is
true: packages being replaced have a higher maturity, as they have
either been taken out of ATrpms into FC, or ATrpms has enhanced the
build with more BuildRequires/configure options. Packages required at
a newer version are usually checked against Rawhide.
Like a fixed readline lib that didn't core dump when pressing
backspace at the beginning of the line. :P I think it took the legacy
project over a year to do anything about that. But, I digress. (and
I've moved on past RH9 ever since...)
--
-jeff